Copyright © 2010
Created January 2, 2010
Updated January 27, 2010. See document history at end for details.
Active Inductor Example
Low-Noise JFET Phono Preamp
This is an example only. It is not intended to be final or
complete design.
This is a redesign using LSK170 JFETs on the input. You still may
want to use the
2N3819 design because
of the difficulty of obtaining
LSK170's.
Figure
1: Schematic
|
|
Parts List
|
|
Q1-Q4 |
LSK170C n-ch jfet |
Q5,Q6 |
BS170 n-ch mosfet |
R1,R3,R5,R7
|
56Ω, 5% |
R2,R4,R6,R8
|
56Ω, 5% |
R2L
|
48.7kΩ, 1% |
R2N
|
7.15kΩ, 1%
|
C1N,a
|
43nF, 1% or 5% |
C1N,b
|
2nF, 1% or 5% |
C2N,a |
15nF, 1% or 5% |
|
C2N,b
|
390pF, 1% or 5% |
R1L |
30.9kΩ, 1%
|
CL |
10,000µF, 25V
electrolytic
|
R9,R11
|
1kΩ, 5%
|
R12
|
82Ω, 5%
|
R13
|
1kΩ, 5%
|
C2
|
100µF, 25V
electrolytic
|
R15
|
1kΩ pot |
S1,S2 |
SPST reed relay,
normally closed, coil rated 10mA@5V
|
|
|
|
Remaining values are left for you to calculate. See text.
|
Initial Design Decisions
- Discrete voltage input design with 46db gain at 1kHz will amplify
5mV rms input to produce 1V rms
before attenuator.
- Q1-Q4 are LSK170 n-ch jfet (chosen for
excellent 1nV/rtHz noise specification). Use C grade to
accommadate current requirements.
- I chose four devices because multiple parallel devices devices
increase
S/N by sqrt(# of devices). In this case bettering the effective
noise specification to 0.866nV/rtHz. (Gate and source resistor
choices prevent ideal effective input noise of 0.5nV/rtHz)
- Q5,Q6 are BS170 n-ch mosfet (commonly
available)
- vgs,max of Q6
of 20V limits VDD due to
startup relays. Choose VDD = 18V.
- Let bias of active inductor set bias to gate of Q6 to eliminate
coupling capacitor.
vg,Q5
= |
(VDD-vgs-Q5-max)+vsg-Q1-max
2
|
=
|
18V-2V+8V
2
|
= 12V
|
- R2L of active inductor functions as R1 of
passive
RIAA network.
- I chose to do the small signal class-a design with a fourier
series
based distortion predictor tool out of convenience. Small signal
class-a design is not in the scope of this article.
- Because of possibility of negative feedback from buffer stage
back to gain stage through power supply, I decided to recommend two
power supply taps.
Gain Stage Design
Although I used a convenient fourier series analysis tool to do the
small signal analysis, there were some design decisions. I wanted
to choose gate and source resistors small enough to make their noise
contribution insignificant compared to the JFET. This would lower
noise and allow the possiblity of noise improvement with better JFETs.
Resistor
noise equation (per rtHz, figure of merit, does not account for
bandwidth)
|
vn-resistor-rtHz =
sqrt(4kTR)
|
Rearrange resistor noise equation to calculate equivalent input noise
resistance of JFET.
R =
|
vn-resistor-rtHz2
4kT
|
=
|
1nV2
4 x 1.3806504e-23 x 298.15ºK |
= 60.73254378Ω |
I would like to choose R
G and R
S much lower than
60Ω to make their
contribution insignificant. However, I believe a 6Ω source
resistor would greatly raise distortion and bias for a small signal
transistor. Rather, instead I will match the source resistor to
the JFET noise resistance.
R1-R8 = 56Ω.
Because the fourier series analysis of this low noise design showed
higher distortion than the 2N3819 version (but still very good) and
because decreasing the source resistors furthur would increase the
distortion, I made no furthur analysis with lower source resistor
values.
Fourier Series Analysis of Q1-Q4 (excluding
drain load)
Analysis of Common Source Circuit
transistor type = JFET
transconductance = 22mS
threshold voltage = -1V
source resistor = 56Ω
Input signal (peak) = 7.0710678mV
Input bias = 0V
Output signal (peak) = 72.364457µA
Output bias = 8.4337081mA
Gain = 10.23388mS
Total distortion = 22.089411nA = 0.03052522% = -70.3068dB
Breakdown by harmonic
harmonic |
value |
percent |
dB |
|
0 |
8.4337302mA |
11654.52014075% |
41.33dB |
DC Offset
|
1 |
72.364457µA |
100.00000000% |
0.00dB |
Fundamental |
2 |
22.089411nA |
0.03052522% |
-70.31dB |
|
RIAA Analysis
Refer
Calculating Passive RIAA
Equalization in article Phono Equalization
Calculations.
From this fourier analysis we can calculate R
1 of Passive
RIAA network (aka R
2L)
R2L =
|
(Low frequency RIAA boost
relative to 1kHz) x (1kHz output voltage)
(Output signal current) x
(#parallel devices) |
=
|
10 x 1.414213562V
72.364457µA x 4 |
= 48.85732655kΩ |
Round to nearest 1% value.
R2L =
48.7kΩ
Given R
1:R
2
= 6.877358491
R2N = |
48.7kΩ
6.877358491 |
= 7.081207133kΩ |
Round to nearest 1% value.
R2N =
7.15kΩ
Given R
1C
1 = 2187µS
C1N =
|
2187µS
48.7kΩ |
= 44.90759754nF
|
Round down to nearest 5% value: 43nF
Choose parallel 5% value to makeup remainder: 2nF
C1N = 43nF + 2nF
Given R
1C
2 = 750µS
C2N =
|
750µS
48.7kΩ |
= 15.40041068nF
|
Round down to nearest 5% value: 15nF
Choose parallel 5% value to makeup remainder: 390pF
C2N = 15nF + 390pF
Active Inductor Analysis
Refer article
Active Inductor Load.
- Choose R2L for gain of overall circuit.
R
2L chosen already in RIAA analysis.
BS170 specification: g
m
= 320mS.
g
fs = 2 x sqrt(g
mi
D)
= 2 x sqrt(320mS x 8.4337081mA x 4) = 207.7993876mS
R1L =
|
R2L
|
Vbias
vT+sqrt(iD/gm) |
-1
|
|
|
=
|
48.7kΩ
|
6V
2V+sqrt((8.4337081mA
x 4)/320mS) |
-1
|
|
|
= 30.80342288kΩ |
Round to nearest 1% value:
R1L =
30.9kΩ
- Choose CL to set the pole frequency the desired amount
below the
passband. (equation (21))
CL =
|
gfsR1L+1
2πfPOLER1L |
=
|
(207.7993876mS x 30.9kΩ)+1
2π x 5Hz x 30.9kΩ |
= 6.615490071mF
|
3300µF would work here. I would rather choose a larger common
value (
CL =
10,000µF) and solve for a lower pole.
fPOLE =
|
gfsR1L+1
2πCLR1L |
=
|
(207.7993876mS x 30.9kΩ)+1
2π x 10mF x 30.9kΩ |
= 3.307745035Hz |
- Determine if a bypass switch is needed to charge the capacitor on
startup.
Power on relay added at beginning of design.
Calculate charge time for C
L:
Rearrange capacitor equation above and calculate time. (2V
presumes v
gs not much more than v
T)
Δt =
|
CΔv
iD |
=
|
10mF x 2V
8.4337081mA x 4 |
= 592.8590296mSec
|
Q6 Circuit Design
My design goal here was reasonably low output impedance. 1kΩ
output impedance would have been low enough to minimize voltage loss
into a typical 47kΩ load. I choose 500Ω instead on the far chance
of driving a 600Ω load with a tolerable voltage loss.
Fourier Series Analysis of Q6 Circuit
Note: This analysis based on a more convenient equivalent model
of source circuit. Two 500Ω are modeled in series with one
bypassed by a capacitor in place of the parallel circuit shown.
Analysis of Common Source Circuit
transistor type = MOSFET
transconductance = 320mS
threshold voltage = 2V
source resistor = 500Ω
Input signal (peak) = 1.4142136V
Input bias = 7V
Output signal (peak) = 2.7910912mA
Output bias = 9.8041739mA
1
Gain = 1.9735995mS
Total distortion = 950.79116nA = 0.03406521% = -69.3538dB
Breakdown by harmonic
harmonic |
value |
percent |
dB |
|
0 |
9.805058mA1 |
351.29836800% |
10.91dB |
DC Offset
|
1 |
2.7910912mA |
100.00000000% |
0.00dB |
Fundamental |
2 |
888.84698nA |
0.03184586% |
-69.94dB |
|
3 |
56.727241nA |
0.00203244% |
-93.84dB |
|
4 |
4.7600566nA |
0.00017054% |
-115.36dB |
|
5 |
456.88194pA |
0.00001637% |
-135.72dB |
|
Miscellaneous Calculations
R
12 limits charge current through Q
6 to C
2
to <500mA
R
12 >= 20V/500mA = 40Ω
Choose
R12 =
82Ω.
Want to set C
2 for as low a highpass pole as C
L.
First find R
equiv of pole. Output impedance of Q
6
is the inverse of its operating ac transconductance g
fs.
g
fs = 2 x sqrt(g
mi
D) therefore
Rout-Q6 =
|
1
2 x sqrt(gmiD) |
=
|
1
2 x sqrt(320mS x
9.8041739mA) |
= 8.92667066Ω |
Requiv = (Rout-Q6
|| R13) + R15 = |
Rout-Q6 x R13
Rout-Q6 + R13 |
+ R15 = 1.00884769kΩ |
C2 =
|
1
2πfpoleRequiv |
=
|
1
2π x 3.307745035Hz x
1.00884769kΩ |
= 47.69386318µF
|
Choose
C2 =
100µF.
Choose R
10 and R
14 to set 10mA through
relay coil.
R10 =
|
VDD-vCOIL
iCOIL
|
=
|
18V-5V
10mA |
= 1.3kΩ |
Calculate load current from power supplies V
DD1 and V
DD2.
i
DD1 = i
Q1-BIAS x 4 + i
RELAYCOIL =
8.4337081mA x 4 + 10mA = 43.7348324mA
i
DD2 = i
Q6-BIAS + i
RELAYCOIL =
9.8041739mA + 10mA = 19.8041739mA
Design Decisions Left to You
- Ri and Ci should be calculated per article Phono
Termination Calculations and
Calculator.
- Gate resistors were somewhat arbitrarily chosen. They seem
to be good values. I know that the 1kΩ values work with the
BS170. I have seen many jfet schematics without gate resistors at
all. Increase them if any oscillations occur. Because the
gate resistor noise in this design is the same as that of the JFET
chosen, I suggest trying to lower or eliminate gate resistors on the
JFETs, so long as they do not oscillate.
- Relay components C1
and C3 must be calculated as follows:
C
1 must be chosen by calculation or experimentation to
exceed C
L
charge time calculated above (432.2244809mSec). C
3
would then be
chosen for a somewhat longer delay to prevent a pop from the activation
of the other relay.
- This circuit and its analysis is only given as an example; change
everything if you like.
- A low noise 18V power supply. I recommend the circuit of
article Line Level Class A Power Supply.
1There is a seeming discrepancy
in the fourier
analysis between the cited output bias and the same value given in the
analysis. The first value is the bias without any signal and the
second with a signal. This effect is created by the same asymetrical
transfer curve that gives us a desireable second order distortion
characteristic. The positive half of the signal is amplified more
than the negative half. As a result the dc bias is modulated by
the average signal level. This small component amounts to AM
demodulation of the music signal. Abstractly, I had already
anticipated this effect. I would be curious what effect this has
on the overall sound. Is is detrimental, or does it add an extra
euphonic bass urge?
Document History
January 2, 2010 Created
January 2, 2010 Minor Updates.
January 5, 2010 Recommend split power supply to prevent
feedback.
Update schematic to show change. Recommend specific power supply.
January 5, 2010 Choose relays S1 and S2, calculate their series
resistors, and calculate specific load current for each power supply
tap.
January 9, 2010 Added footnote explaining how fourier series
analysis
shows modulation of dc bias by music signal.
January 17, 2010 Added design criteria for class-a biasing
decisions.
January 17, 2010 Create new version of document based on LSK170
input JFETs. Only Gain stage, RIAA, and Active Inductor analyses
changed.
January 22, 2010 Minor Corrections. Modify schematic for
clarity. Capacitor cited wrong in CL charge time
calculation. Calculated result already correct.
Change C2 calculation to match CL pole.
Kept same C2 choice.
January 23, 2010 Correct schematic in vicinity of Q4, R7,
and R2N.
January 27, 2010 Minor improvement to writing
style.