The election of George Bush in
2000 greatly distressed those who hoped
to continue concealment of the crimes of Nortel and their
accomplices. Certainly, I had seen the signs. Nortel
seemingly spied on everyone to advance their interests and no doubt
they
had to manage the president too. It would be unlikely to the mind
of anyone that knew what was going on that they would do
otherwise. I had perhaps noticed minor clues, but one day there
was finally no doubt. The word at work, that spoken with the
certainty typical of that presumed from espionage, was that Bill
Clinton was going to invade Iraq. No, not just bomb it, but to
actually invade it. After a period of seeing no mention of this
intent in the news, Clinton bombed Baghdad as most remember.
Having established that Nortel spied on Clinton, their obsession that
he remain in power suggests further that they blackmailed him as
well. During the days leading up to Clinton's impeachment, Nortel
management was obviously angry and upset. What was wrong?
Then when my house was invaded on the eve of the Senate impeachment
vote, I knew they were angry that Clinton's impeachment would end their
means of concealment. I reasoned that If I was spied on as
designated scapegoat,
this espionage could at times be visible to wider circles in high
political places. Later, shortly after Bush actually won the
presidency, an employee meeting hosted by Nortel senior management
insinuated a plea of forgiveness from some unnamed person. Yes,
now they were more afraid than ever.
If Clinton shared any of Nortel's motive to tamper with process, I
would have to watch the news to see if he made any move to tamper
Bush. After watching to no particular outcome, finally it was
announced that both presidents Bush would attend the inauguration of
Clinton's presidential library. Sure enough, Bush senior and
Clinton suddenly became best of pals. What might Clinton
say? He might allege that investigation into certain matters
would implicate covert activities against me during his father's
administration. Perhaps Bush junior would not want to subject his
father
to that kind of scrutiny. Indeed, Nortel had caused so much
trouble in 1990 by reckless espionage activity that Federal agents were
milling around town trying to discover what was going on. This
prompted Nortel and their accomplices to plunge me into darkness to
make sure that I could not tell. In this
light, a military-caliber flamethrower assault against me in 2006 was
certainly defending issues arising from Clinton's terms in office
whether the activity went around Bush or through him by means of
deception. Then when the assault was revealed, Bush could be
extorted by the Democrats to go away quietly with no opportunity to
defend himself.
Clinton however was not content with just this maneuver however, as he,
along with Rahm Emanuel, was the primary operative pushing a desperate
campaign to regain power for the Democrats during the Congressional
elections of 2006. Apart from the obvious continual slander of
Bush, they did some unprecedented things as well, things perhaps
signaling desperation on their part. One was pressuring their
benefactors for funds. It is normal protocol not to do this
because of fear of alienating their economic base. You really
can't ordinarily boss a billionaire or manipulate him because they have
a
sense of power perhaps bigger than the politicians they finance.
Then in
2008, you could not fail to notice that Bill's crusade to elect his
wife showed an abnormally short temper. This time he could not
afford to lose, although the Democrats and Obama would likely go to
any length to protect their shared interests. Finally he did lose
and then
had the fortune to
have Hillary placed in Obama's cabinet to give him hope that
they could manipulate their interests.
Now Hillary is campaigning for Terry McAuliffe, someone close enough to
their circle to be their operative.
The Clintons have long been close
with
McAuliffe. He headed the Democratic National Committee while President
Clinton was in office and was a top fundraiser for Hillary Clinton's
2008 presidential campaign.
1
Could I trust him to be governor when the governance of Virginia stands
to influence the outcome of the seemingly obstructed investigations of
covert crimes associated with Clinton and Nortel.
2 After that I have
to consider any significance of Hillary's aspirations for the
presidency.
Don't let them extinguish the
light at the end of the tunnel, if there is one.
The Empire Strikes Back
On the day before the election, I went to upload a correction to
my website. When I did, I found my linux installation hacked
impeding my desire to use what I thought a more secure linux to do the
upload. The means to mount my usual removable media had been
disabled. I had thought that I had secured this installation
better than ever on the last linux reload. However, I had just
made a new installation of Windows 7. Seemingly, Windows was
immediately hacked and linux hacked from there as Windows displayed an
obscure message "353 updates of 353 completed" immediately after
installing the antivirus with automatic updates turned off and before I
had actually made any. The hackers that work my computer usually
show some sign of hacking after a new installation as if they want me
to think resistance is futile. As for motive, reconnecting the
link to the article
Pandora's
Box may have been provocative to someone, but rather I suspect that
someone did not want me to follow up on this article. What do you
think of the attempt to censor political free speech before an
election? For myself, I feel I am crying out from behind the iron
curtain. I may give a little time before I try to secure my
computer again on the far chance that someone wants to investigate.
Happy Jackboots!
1Cameron Joseph,
"Hillary Clinton to campaign in Virginia with McAuliffe," October 14,
2013, The Hill
2See article: I Am an Island - Along with a
few other captives
Document History
October 16, 2013 Created.
November 19, 2013 Added postscript The Empire Strikes Back.
