Copyright © 2016 by Wayne Stegall
Updated September 2, 2016. See Document History at end for
details.
One-Bend Amplifier
Part 4: Improvements include lower
hum
Introduction
After the number of output transistors was increased to eight to
improve the thermal analysis it was deemed also that an improvement in
hum was likely if the inner feedback loop returned to the cascode of
the first stage rather than directly to the second. Therefore I
deemed it necessary to implement the changes and re-validate the SPICE
analysis. Circuits and analysis follow.
Circuits
Note: Component values can be obtained from the SPICE models for
now.
Figure
1:
Amplifier
Schematic
|
|
SPICE
model
Figure
2:
Unregulated
power
supply |
|
SPICE model
Figure
3:
Regulated
power
supply |
|
SPICE model
Spice Results
Begin hum measurements with unregulated supply to first two stages
Fourier analysis for vout:
No. Harmonics: 16, THD: 67.8647 %, Gridsize: 200, Interpolation
Degree: 3
Harmonic |
Frequency |
Magnitude |
|
Decibels |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
120 |
0.00295888 |
|
-50.5775 |
2 |
240 |
0.00144109 |
|
-56.8262 |
3 |
360 |
0.000940647 |
|
-60.5315 |
4 |
480 |
0.00066636 |
|
-63.5258 |
5 |
600 |
0.000506254 |
|
-65.9126 |
6 |
720 |
0.000385225 |
|
-68.2857 |
7 |
840 |
0.00030367 |
|
-70.352 |
8 |
960 |
0.000233349 |
|
-72.6399 |
9 |
1080 |
0.000184023 |
|
-74.7026 |
10 |
1200 |
0.000138508 |
|
-77.1705 |
11 |
1320 |
0.000106726 |
|
-79.4346 |
12 |
1440 |
7.62605E-05 |
|
-82.354 |
13 |
1560 |
5.59989E-05 |
|
-85.0364 |
14 |
1680 |
3.58895E-05 |
|
-88.9007 |
15 |
1800 |
2.37921E-05 |
|
-92.4713 |
Calculate total hum from apparent THD.
(1)
|
vhum = vhum1
× (1 + THDapparent) = 0.00295888 × (1 + 0.678647 ) =
4.96692mV |
(2)
|
vhum =
20log(4.96692mV)
= -46.0783dBV |
Because hum is higher than suspected, go back to supply regulating
first
two stages and analyze again
Fourier analysis for vout:
No. Harmonics: 16, THD: 74.2546 %, Gridsize: 200, Interpolation
Degree: 3
Harmonic |
Frequency |
Magnitude |
|
Decibels |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
120 |
9.80761E-07 |
|
-120.169 |
2 |
240 |
4.71169E-07 |
|
-126.536 |
3 |
360 |
3.25877E-07 |
|
-129.739 |
4 |
480 |
2.36987E-07 |
|
-132.506 |
5 |
600 |
1.93989E-07 |
|
-134.244 |
6 |
720 |
1.59653E-07 |
|
-135.936 |
7 |
840 |
1.37583E-07 |
|
-137.220 |
8 |
960 |
1.20571E-07 |
|
-138.375 |
9 |
1080 |
1.06839E-07 |
|
-139.425 |
10 |
1200 |
9.66625E-08 |
|
-140.295 |
11 |
1320 |
8.76482E-08 |
|
-141.145 |
12 |
1440 |
8.05205E-08 |
|
-141.882 |
13 |
1560 |
7.44112E-08 |
|
-142.567 |
14 |
1680 |
6.9202E-08 |
|
-143.198 |
15 |
1800 |
6.45515E-08 |
|
-143.802 |
Calculate total hum from apparent THD.
(3)
|
vhum = vhum1
× (1 + THDapparent) = 9.80761e-07 × (1 + 0.742546 ) =
1.70902µV |
(4)
|
vhum =
20log(1.70902µV)
= -115.345dBV |
Now that hum is acceptable continue with distortion analysis at 1kHz.
Fourier analysis for vout:
No. Harmonics: 16, THD: 0.0152017 %, Gridsize: 200,
Interpolation Degree: 3
Harmonic |
Frequency |
Magnitude |
|
Norm.Mag |
|
Percent |
|
Decibels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1000 |
21.1954 |
|
1 |
|
100 |
|
0 |
2 |
2000 |
0.00321471 |
|
0.00015167 |
|
0.015167 |
|
-76.382 |
3 |
3000 |
0.000216674 |
|
1.02227E-05 |
|
0.00102227 |
|
-99.8087 |
4 |
4000 |
1.73009E-05 |
|
8.16258E-07 |
|
8.16258E-05 |
|
-121.763 |
5 |
5000 |
1.55152E-06 |
|
7.32006E-08 |
|
7.32006E-06 |
|
-142.71 |
6 |
6000 |
1.34958E-07 |
|
6.36731E-09 |
|
6.36731E-07 |
|
-163.921 |
7 |
7000 |
2.64258E-08 |
|
1.24677E-09 |
|
1.24677E-07 |
|
-178.084 |
8 |
8000 |
3.92902E-08 |
|
1.85372E-09 |
|
1.85372E-07 |
|
-174.639 |
9 |
9000 |
2.10337E-08 |
|
9.92371E-10 |
|
9.92371E-08 |
|
-180.067 |
10 |
10000 |
1.5393E-08 |
|
7.26245E-10 |
|
7.26245E-08 |
|
-182.778 |
11 |
11000 |
1.76767E-08 |
|
8.33989E-10 |
|
8.33989E-08 |
|
-181.577 |
12 |
12000 |
4.92896E-09 |
|
2.32549E-10 |
|
2.32549E-08 |
|
-192.67 |
13 |
13000 |
3.43396E-08 |
|
1.62014E-09 |
|
1.62014E-07 |
|
-175.809 |
14 |
14000 |
2.99262E-08 |
|
1.41192E-09 |
|
1.41192E-07 |
|
-177.004 |
15 |
15000 |
2.39516E-08 |
|
1.13004E-09 |
|
1.13004E-07 |
|
-178.938 |
Validate the remainder of the design.
Figure
4:
Stability
analysis
showing
85º
of
phase
margin. |
|
Figure
5:
Small
signal
error
curve.
Shows dominance of second harmonic.
|
|
Figure
6:
Large
signal
error
curve.
Shows dominance of second harmonic then third.
|
|
|
|
Figure
7:
Bode
shows
frequency
response
down
3dB
at
495kHz
|
|
Conclusions
Hum is considerably improved relative to the last implementation with
regulation however not enough to be rid of the regulators
altogether. The remainder of the analysis remains as good as
before.
1Note: Raw Fourier
analysis data has been processed in spreadsheet to calculate related
results and reformatted.
2See related article: Thermal Design Part 2.
3See related article: Floating Source-follower Regulator.
Document History
August 20, 2016 Created.
August 27, 2016 Added note to get component values from SPICE
models added missing equation numbers for calculations.
September 2, 2016 Minor correction to caption to figure 7.