| Home │ Political
New evidence of witness tampering.
Occasionally I search the web with search phrases including my name in hopes that I may catch a crime committed against me. On April 7, I got a Google result with the phrase "This site is relatively popular among users in the united states."
To compare my traffic report from March 1, 2016 to February 28, 2017 shows 55165 total visitors for an average of 4597 per month. March 2017 instead is anomalous showing similar daily traffic as before with a large spike for two days driving a total for the month of 9240. The screen shot below of my view of web statistics shows 13 months even though set for 12. So the total I give is that seen minus the extra month of March 2017.
Given the discrepancy, who is lied to: me or you?
Consider the possibilities:
While holding evidence suggesting censorship, I face other apparent tampering. After the election of Trump, I thought that my legal access would become unblocked. However, after some time with no rescue, I decided to try contacting help from lawyers again. The following are logs I made:
20170302Thu lawyercontact Sent package to The Rutherford Institute.
20170302Thu lawyercontact Sent package to Alliance Defending Freedom.
20170317Fri journal 2:20pm Denied USPS tracking service. Operated correctly under private browser window. Then verified denial of service under non-private browser window. Selective denial of service?
20170317Fri lawyercontact Called Rutherford Institute. Receptionist had me leave voice mail with lawyer.
All this resulted my not receiving any response from the attempted contact. I think it likely that the two firms would be interesting in helping me and even if not would return a polite denial notice. I think the denial of access to the Post Offices tracking service notable. It would have required selective refusal based on identifying me from my browser interface. Indeed from the way it operated it seemed the Post Office website itself would have to have been manipulated This tampering then would increase the odds that the entire thing had been tampered.
Certainly those who intend to deny me justice indefinitely have a particular end in mind for me knowing that I am unemployed.
2“Whistle-blowers Evidence, Uncut,” May 22, 2006, WIRED News, www.wired.com.
3Greg Walton,“China’s Golden Shield: Corporations and the Development of Surveillance Technology in the People’s Republic of China,” October 2001, Rights and Democracy: www.ichrdd.ca.
April 18, 2017 Created.