Obama the Fox

Barack Obama's hidden globalist agenda

Astute observers might have become concerned that Obama was going to advance globalism when a statement on CNBC by Henry Kissinger followed earlier reports that Obama and Hillary attended the Bilderberger conference held in United States during the 2008 election cycle. However, the immediate march of the most radical political agenda ever seen in America caused this concern to fall out of sight. Let's reconsider Kissinger's advice to Obama.¹

"I think that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a "New World Order" can be created. It's a great opportunity. It isn't such a crisis."

Someone might argue that Henry is only giving an opinion not binding on Obama until they find out that Kissinger directed his foreign policy when he first took office.²

Thank you for that wonderful tribute to Henry Kissinger yesterday. Congratulations. As the most recent National Security Adviser of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in the National Security Council that exists today.

How then would Obama implement Kissinger's New World Order?

Like many he would appoint cabinet members from globalist organizations. Perhaps he thought that drawing Susan Rice, and then Hagel from the Atlantic Council would escape the sort of notice that drawing members from the Council on Foreign Relations would have.
His socialist agenda could create subterfuge by appearing radical and make a larger relationship with America and its allies more palatable by making our government more like those of opposing nations.
By creating international infrastructure suitable to these goals whenever the pretext allows. I have read that while the Democrats held absolute power that they passed laws pertaining to the CITES treaty that have our authorities enforcing foreign endangered species laws. For this reason many fear the signing of a UN gun control treaty will take away our rights.
Obama's open borders debacle likely advances globalisation instead of the human charity by which it seeks to find cover. Consider that the North American Union that failed previously because it was exposed by Lou Dobbs of CNN had to continue under some new guise. Consider also that Obama took a stand against illegal immigration before he took power. Now his radical abuse of power covertly advances this New World Order.

“Native-born Americans suspect that it is they, and not the immigrant, who are being forced to adapt to social changes caused by migration," he said. “And if I’m honest with myself, I must admit that I’m not entirely immune to such nativist sentiments,” Obama wrote. “When I see Mexican flags waved at pro-immigration demonstrations, I sometimes feel a flush of patriotic resentment. When I’m forced to use a translator to communicate with the guy fixing my car, I feel a certain frustration.”³

Then Biden announces a date to achieve this goal in a foreign speech.⁴

Ladies and gentlemen, in 2017, the United States for the first time, Caucasians of European descent like me will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America.

Why do they need to subvert the power of majority voters to achieve this goal? To those watching only Obama's radical agenda it is obvious that they want to ensure the indefinite continuity of the Democratic political machine that they held, although now they have the additional task of getting it back from a new Republican majority in Congress as well. However, larger things loom than party politics because the powers of the world have an agenda of their own. Patriotic Americans are viewed as an obstacle to this agenda and their ability to oppose it at the voting booth must be quenched. The ruthless could do no less.

Because America's sovereignty is what is under attack in all these things, consider the following remarks by the president of the CFR.

Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function. ... All of this suggests that sovereignty must be redefined if states are to cope with globalisation. ... Globalisation thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere. Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary. ...

Because this secret agenda seeks to overthrow the sovereignty of the United States of America, those of Obama's acts of abuse power meant to advance it by subtlety constitute treason.

Treason!

¹"Kissinger: Obama's 'task' is to help create a 'new world order'," January 6, 2009, The Raw Story: www.rawstory.com, link.
²"Remarks by National Security Adviser Jones at 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy," February 8, 2009, Speeches and Remarks, The White House: www.whitehouse.gov, link.
³Barack Obama, Audacity of Hope, (2006) as quoted by "Obama Says Illegal Immigration HURTS ‘Blue-Collar Americans,’ STRAINS Welfare," November 16, 2014, The Daily Caller: www.dailycaller.com, link.
⁴"Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to the Global Entrepreneurship Summit," November 20, 2014, Speeches and Remarks, The White House: www.whitehouse.gov, link.
⁵Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations, “Sovereignty and Globalization,” February 17, 2006, Council on Foreign Relations: www.cfr.org

Document History
January 27, 2015 Created.
January 27, 2015 Corrected some spelling. Elaborated on some points.
March 26, 2015 Corrected a point of grammar and removed an redundant phrase.