Copyright © 2017 by Wayne Stegall
Created April 1, 2017. See Document History at end for
After a suspense filled election where Trump won in spite of many
Democratic maneuvers to rig the outcome for Hillary, I felt content to
watch and see who Trump would carry out his campaign promises.
However the liberals have not been so gracious. Instead they have
turned to every immoral and illegal device to oppose him. Their
body language often shows malice when they do these things – one even
to the point of eyes tearing up with hatred – so that you wonder if
have something inside like Martin Bashir when he said that someone
defecate in Sarah Palin's mouth. So much for the liberal claim to
In many cases they lie to rebut a statement by Trump that is either
obviously true or that has probable cause to be true pending some
- In the case where Trump said millions of undocumented
illegally he has probable cause. Consider that Obama gave an
interview to the Latino community encouraging them to vote. Here
is an excerpt from his interview with Latina Gina Rodriguez.1
Rodriguez: Many of the
Millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens – and I call
them citizens because they contribute to this country – are fearful of
voting. So if I vote will immigration know where I live?
Will they come for my family and deport us?
Obama: Not true. The reason is first of all when you vote
you are a
citizen yourself. and there is not a situation where the voting
rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating and
et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in
terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who is
maybe is undocumented then you have an even greater reason to vote.
If this does not convince you, consider that other preparations were
made for illegal voting. First Obama gave Social Security Numbers
to illegals, then California gave them driver's licenses no different
from other citizens except for a small mark which could be overlooked.
- Also when Trump accused Obama of spying on him, the liberal
him of a careless manufacture. However it is easy to think that
an article published on the front page of the New York Times on January
20 entitled "Wiretapped Data Used in Inquiry of Trump Aides"2 gave him
justification. Odd that the newspaper tried to discredit
and bury their own article to aid the smear of the President.
- Then attempts to smear Trump regarding Russia advance two
story lines in the hope to smear Trump in the middle. One that
there were conversations between Trump associates and Russia and the
other that there was Russian hacking of the election. As for the
former, it is not illegal to have a conversation with anyone if the
content is proper. Furthermore it is routine for the American
government to have foreign conversations. Then too an
person has already said that the alleged spied on conversations did
not implicate Trump's team of any wrongdoing. As for the hacking,
any Russian hacking implicates no one else but Russia unless other
activities are involved. Then there is reason to believe that the
declared desperate efforts by the CIA to combat an attack against the
election are merely a political ruse. In defense of this belief
consider that it was declared that no actual hack occurred or succeeded
against voting machines or the vote count. Given this what did
Obama fear? That some would say something damaging to the Clinton
campaign? Perhaps he feared a recent WikiLeaks disclosure that
the CIA used hacking tools and techniques stolen from Russia and others
hack under a false flag.3 Then it
would be plausible to think the
CIA could tamper with the election and blame the Russians, an idea not
unlikely considering all that went before. (After I had written
of this, news came that vindicates this and previous line of deduction
even if other
details are involved. See external article: "Intelligence
says") However don't let this
propaganda frenzy cause you to forget a real complication with
Russia: that Hillary Clinton betrayed our national interests to
broker a deal to sell 20% of America's uranium production capacity to
- Finally, consider the travel ban and its logic to the
mind, then consider folly. I remember a few years ago when the
concern of Christians was that Obama would not allow the immigration of
Middle Eastern Christians who were feared would be exterminated by
too Obama had his own travel ban in 2011.8
travel ban would wrong Muslims there is an
outcry. A reasonable person would think that if Obama legally
blocked immigration of endangered Christians that the opposition to
Trump's ban to prevent terrorist from entry would be more so. And
yet radicals in high places think to violate the Constitution to oppose
the legitimate exercise of power because it seems right in their own
In this last point, I wonder if the liberal mind is geared to spawn its
own punishment. They have murdered the unborn, subverted justice,
law, and the political process, set up Christians for persecution by
perverts, and committed other evil. Consequences must arise and
Islam seems more than willing to execute the same. It is
unfortunate that good people are set up to share in their punishment.
1See Gina Rodriguez'
interview with Barack Obama, Youtube video,
2"Wiretapped Data Used in Inquiry
of Trump Aides," January 20, 2017, The New York Times.
3"Umbrage," WikiLeaks, wikileaks.org, link.
4Jo Becker and Mike
McIntire, "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal," April 23, 2015, The New York Times,
5"Here's The BOMBSHELL
Hillary/Russia Uranium Story That The Media Refused To Cover," February 17, 2017, The Sean Hannity Show,
6Tammy Bruce, "Obama's bizarre
immigration rules," March 6, 2014,
The Washington Times, www.washingtontimes.com, link.
7Raymond Ibrahim, "Obama Throws
Christian Refugees to Lions,"
September 24, 2015, Gatestone Institute, www.gatestoneinstitute.org, link.
8Sean Davis, "The Obama
Administration Stopped Processing Iraq Refugee Requests for 6 Months in
2011," November 18, 2015, The
Federalist, thefederalist.com, link.
April 1, 2017 Created.