|
The Democratic Coup of 2006My mother received
a phone call trying to sell her Encore, a movie package for DirecTV. Because I thought it was a bad idea, I
advised her to consult dad first.
Because they offered her incentives, a special deal and a trial offer
period, she bought it anyway. When
activated however, it turned out to be a Trojan horse. They gratuitously added the Hustler channel
to the lineup. What a coincidence that
I should have to step over this mine just prior to the election of 2006. There was no real danger that I would fall
in, but how could they justify risking my family for their political treachery? While searching the web for information
about the Foley scandal, Representative Hastert’s assertion that George Soros
and Democratic operatives, led by Bill Clinton, were plotting to steal back
power from the Republicans seemed very credible to me. The devious smiles by which Democratic
strategists claimed their certain victory seemed to suggest there was more in
the works than a straightforward election.
When the Ted Haggard scandal broke, I was angered at the carefully
timed political slander. A guest on
the news said with a smile barely concealing his glee over the outcome of the
election, “Christians should not be involved in politics,” betraying
additional motive behind the Democratic scheme After the election, my mom decided that
she did not want the Encore movie package after all. When she called to cancel it, she found
that they had not given her the incentives by which they sought to draw her
in. This was not the
first time that this system has sought my soul. I was searching the web for a panettone
recipe During the 2006 holiday season when hackers popped up an offer of
neighboring If they sought my
soul, could they have not also sought that of Ted Haggard? Consider that the initial report from
church investigators was that they found other sin in his life and not that
for which he was accused. The church
would be bound to discipline him either way.
Political hacking could have lured him into some other immorality of
which we have not yet heard. As for
the final political representation of Ted, my experience demonstrates that
the political machine does not give opportunity for rebuttal when they do
these kinds of things, besides that, he would be too humiliated to respond
anyway. As for motive, Ted’s
friendship with George Bush would make him a clear target for the Democratic
plot. The Republican’s
Contract with Furthermore, the
Democrats have not stopped blaming Bush for the Iraq War. This war was already determined by the
Council on Foreign Relations according to a document that I examined on their
website from 1994. Whatever else you
may think of them, their influence gives continuity to foreign policy under
both Democratic and Republican administrations. In an address to
the Council on Foreign Relations on December 15, 2003, Senator Hillary
Clinton said she agreed with former This statement of
affiliation with the Now we have more
Democratic irregularities. Let us hope
they do not steal this election too! PostScript: After I wrote this
article, Ted Haggard spoke in a small church in Illinois.2 He would not disclose the nature of
the sin he admitted committing.
Interestingly, he said the attack on his life occurred at the age of
50. Depending on how accurately he reported
his age, his birthday of By chance, I
happened to find that George Bush is not the oilman the Democrats allege him
to be. He sold his oil business in
1986 to help his father prepare for his election campaign.3 Oddly enough it turns out that Al
“Green” Gore is the oilman. His family
has long running ties to Occidental Petroleum. If these
discoveries were not enough, I also discovered that Rahm
Emmanuel, Barack Obama’s
chief-of-staff, was attributed to be the chief Democratic operative in
securing the 2006 election.4 1.
Council
on Foreign Relations, 2.
Christian
Post, 3.
Encyclopedia
Britannica 2002, article “Bush, George W.” 4.
CNN
Money.com, |
|
